Alex Barnett blog

Stuff

Does Web 2.0 have to mean OWO (Only Works Online)

Ryan Stewart and Richard MacManus are discussing the merits of a browser-only services and development strategy verses an online+offline approach.

They are both kind of right in my view, but it all depends on the experience and the nature of the service you want to deliver. Never mind the 'richness' side of things for the moment (though this is clearly another key point in this debate) - the #1 reason we'll see the hybrid approach do well over the next decade is that this opens the doors for the Occasionally Connected Computing (OCC) scenarios.

Email is the classic example. Should I just not be able to draft, send, read, sort and organize my mail (or calendar, etc) when I'm offline? Or write up a blog post because I'm not within a hotspot's range? Or read my RSS feeds on the plane? What about editing my photos on the train? Etcetara, etcetera.

So, should I just not do stuff because I happen to be offline? Or should my data, my services and my apps be always on, like really 'always on'?

Does Web 2.0 have to mean OWO (Only Works Online)?

Here are some other thoughts on on this topic:

Posted: Sep 27 2006, 02:01 AM by alexbarnett | with 3 comment(s)
Filed under: ,

Comments

alexbarnett said:

Stewart...

Belgium is a small country. When do you think they will have 'total', always on connectivity. And will they need to remove large slabs of concrete to get everywhere humans do?

Nother thought...most of top 20 countries in terms of population fall into the 'large country' category in terms of sq foot...these countries hold 70% (4.5bn) of the total world population (6.5bn):

People's Republic of China (Mainland)

India

United States of America

Indonesia

Brazil

Pakistan

Bangladesh

Russia

Nigeria

Japan

Mexico

Philippines

Vietnam

Germany

Ethiopia

Egypt

Turkey

Iran

Thailand

France

# September 27, 2006 9:26 AM

Stewart said:

Hi Alex,

Well i was thinking of the UK of course as thats where i'm based my 3g card works everywhere i've needed it so far...

http://www.three.co.uk/three/coverage/coverageChecker.do

Here's a coverage map for the UK the yellow is for GSM/GPRS access only, the red covers something like 95% of the population areas

http://www.mobilecomms-technology.com/projects/mobistar/

Above is an article on Belgium, they expect 99% coverage with 3g

Stew

# September 28, 2006 4:22 AM