Does Web 2.0 have to mean OWO (Only Works Online)
Ryan Stewart and Richard MacManus are discussing the merits of a browser-only services and development strategy verses an online+offline approach.
They are both kind of right in my view, but it all depends on the experience and the nature of the service you want to deliver. Never mind the 'richness' side of things for the moment (though this is clearly another key point in this debate) - the #1 reason we'll see the hybrid approach do well over the next decade is that this opens the doors for the Occasionally Connected Computing (OCC) scenarios.
Email is the classic example. Should I just not be able to draft, send, read, sort and organize my mail (or calendar, etc) when I'm offline? Or write up a blog post because I'm not within a hotspot's range? Or read my RSS feeds on the plane? What about editing my photos on the train? Etcetara, etcetera.
So, should I just not do stuff because I happen to be offline? Or should my data, my services and my apps be always on, like really 'always on'?
Does Web 2.0 have to mean OWO (Only Works Online)?
Here are some other thoughts on on this topic: